Wednesday, December 5, 2007

Still Iran is dangerous,Iran is dangerous

Iran is dangerous,Iran is dangerous And Iran will be dangerous

G.W Bush in his speech right after the announcement of the National Intelligence Estimation report which surprised the world and said that Iran had halted its nuclear weapon in 2003 , which proves that its current program is a peaceful just like what the Iranians are saying all the time

A big blow to Bush and his cabinet as this NIE is based on 16 intelligence agencies reports in the United States , still he is insisting that Iran is still a danger !!

Already Bush is famous for his speeches , silly speeches, and this is an example of this kind of speeches , in Arabic it is well known that repeating the word or the sentence is a kind of confirmation and persuasion , the man is trying to convince the American people that Iran is still the greatest threat because with such report there is no longer need for all that preparation of war against Iran. Bush already is insisting that the American policy against Iran will continue , it is not surprise did not they invade Iraq for WMD that till now they are searching for !!??

Yet there is another view , interesting view These reports are not declared suddenly why in this particular time ??

Guys you have to remember very important thing Bush has only number of days in the white house and he will be gone hopefully to become a history , he will leave the oval office with one hell of heritage to the coming President who ever he or she is , the forces in Iraq are enough

And so he wants to leave the office with less damages ,no need to open a new front with Iran , already he is not doing so great in Iraq , no need for escalation

Already it is not only me who thinks that this report is a game made by the American administration itself to calm down the cat and mouse game at least for a while , with this report you can say Goodbye for now , for the current time to any war between the U.S and Iran

Robert Baer a former CIA officer wrote to the time Magazine regarding this point and is saying the same thing

Of course Iran welcomed the report ,I do not doubt ,it is the testimony of the enemy and of course Israel refused the report .

You have to put other factors that led this change in the American view at least indirectly now all the media is speaking about the postponed WWIII

The international scene won't accept another war , the middle east will definitely explode and the first country that will harm will be Israel

The Americans are not ready to send their sons and daughters to be slaughtered not to be killed ,here we are talking about the Iranian Shiite believes in the war

THE International boards like IAEA are not tools in the hands of America at least under the supervision of Ahmed El-Barady , whom I know for sure that after the attack on him will not continue in his position

The international alliance that will lead to WWIII China and Russia are backing up Iran very well , Russia will not let the Americans be on another spot on the Caspian Sea , Afghanistan is enough ,by the way it is interesting to see how Taliban suddenly came back from the ashes strong again !!

Well let's enjoy some world peace,already I was surprised and I did not understand when the Gulf States leaders invited Iran to their summit , you see annually the villain of the summit was always Iran ,this is a historical scene , Nijad with King of Saudi Arabia , powerful scene , but now I understand , they have a clearance from the states , now it is a Peace time period

Of course I wish to say that no the Arab Gulf states do not take orders from D.C and this is a powerful move made by themselves , but I would be fooling myself

Already in this year the Gulf States actually made a powerful move in my opinion which is trying to solve the Emirati islands problem with Iran , Iran invade a couple of Emirati islands and refuses to return them and so the Gulf States put on the table two choices , two peaceful choices , no way on earth they would go to war for these islands , the Peaceful choices are either Iran gives them up or they go for IJC

In the end I would like to ask you to read this long interesting interview with Scott Ritter , who is so sure that this is only a truce and eventually in the end there will be a war ,it is full of wise information and insight

18 comments:

  1. count to 5 and amre will be here ... haha

    in my opinion its just that the US doesn't have enough money to start another war but then again we are talking about bush here so he never fails to surprise

    ReplyDelete
  2. may be , who knows ,already we would know if Iraq becomes stable for some time ,if the shiite clans Iraq calm down in the next few months ,then there must be a deal between the U.S and Iran , Iraq may be a part of the deal not the whole deal

    ReplyDelete
  3. Iran and America are co-occupying Iraq. The apparent stand off was merely a show meticulously designed to sell to the ill-informed Arab masses the Iranian sectarian anti-Arab project. Both Iran and the U.S share a very clear interest in De-arabising the Middle East .



    I shall present to you a list of facts regarding the Iranian crimes and collaboration in Iraq


    Iranian Ambassador was present at the Execution of Saddam Hussein

    2) The current Iraqi puppet government was in exile in Iran for the past 20 years or so.

    3) Iran collaborated with America in its war in Afghanistan.

    4) Iran collaborated with America in its invasion of Iraq.

    5) 75% of all the internally displaced and externally displaced Iraqi refugees are Sunnis.

    6) Iran has funded, trained, and armed through its Revolutionary guards the sectarian militias who are part of the current govt in Iraq.

    7) the sectarian militias have Ethnically cleansed Iraq from Sunnis.

    8) Iran has armed and funded the Kurdish pershmergas along with ISRAEL since 1974 and even before that date.



    The whole issue of Iranian crimes is sustained by the recent incident where the Arab Shiite clans in the south have urged a U.N intervention to oppose the Iranian crimes in Iraq. It is not about Sunnis and Shiites, but rather Iranians and “Iranised Iraqis” vs. Arabs both Shiites and sunnis

    Arabs must put up a solid united front against the Persians like they did in the glorious war of 1973 and liberate Iraq from Iran.

    Wake up Arabs

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. 85% of Iraqis are Arabs-pure Arabs. The ancient civisation of Iraq- Babylon was Arab as well as the Babylonian tongue which is the same as the northern Arabian dialects. Even the pre Islamic Arabian deities – Allat and Hobal were Babylonian.

    In the 19th century some Iranians settled peacefully in Iraq. In the 1970s following tensions and border skirmishes between Iraq and Iran citizens of Iranian origin were deported to Iran.

    When the war of defence erupted against Iran in 1981, political Shiite parties and groups fled to Iran where they supported the Shiite bin Laden- Rohoaalh Serro Allah mossawi Khomeini (Shiites comprised soldiers of the Iraqi front lines and it were them who won the war along with their Sunni Arab brothers.

    After the invasion of Iraq in 2003, fanatic Shiites- the equivalents of Sunni Al-queda terrorists were elevated to high position in the green zone constructed by Iranian and American forces.


    Recently, a confederation of the Shiite Arab clans in the south collected signatures of 3000,000 Iraqi citizens protesting the inclusion of Persian in to governmental institutions and growing number of Iranian settlers.

    The Shiite clan of Bani tamim were subjected to a massacre by Iranian Al-Quds brigades following after they had burned down the Iranian consulate in al-Basra. The events were broadcast I main stream media as a fanatic Shiite group called “Jond al-Samaa” who were causing riots, then were dealt with by the “ Iraqi police”

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. “The Sumerians were not the only people living in this area. Our sources also refer to the Akkadians, who may be an illiterate, lower class that was slowly moving upward in the social pyramid, or an invading nation. We don't know, but it is certain that they spoke a Semitic language related to modern Arabic”

    There is the link:

    http://www.livius.org/ba-bd/babylon/babylonia.html




    Early Semites built civilizations in Mesopotamia and Syria, but slowly lost their political domination of the Near East due to internal turmoil and constant attacks by new nomadic Semitic and non-Semitic groups. The Arameans, Akkadians, Assyrians, Canaanites, Babylonians, Phoenicians, Philistines, Amorites, Sabaeans and Minaeans spoke closely related Semitic languages. These groups often overlapped and mixed racial lines, as did Indo-European speaking groups
    (Journal of Semitic Studies Volume 52, Number 1).


    On the population of Iraq: according to the highly dubious CIA fact book:

    (Arab 75%-80%, Kurdish 15%-20%, Turkoman, Assyrian, or other 5%)


    https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/iz.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's sad to see nations resorting to violence in this day and age to solve simple issues or non-issues all together! MAY PEACE rein worldwide!

    A NAIROBIANS PERSPECTIVE!

    ReplyDelete
  9. @Racoon,thanks for the historical info

    @aardvark, dear it is not a mistake , this is an open forum to speak as you like

    ReplyDelete
  10. no_angel i think you were right. LOL. Bravo 3alaiky

    racoon = amre no question in my mind. I think Amre should go and join the Blackhawk organization that is working in Iraq. Amre you can make so big money and do what your heart desires. Check out Blackhawk's videos on youtube.

    Zeinobia good article of Ritter's that you suggested we read. I have always said that we have all become consumers instead of constituents and especially in the West where protest is at a bare minimal as most people's basic needs have been met. Protest is still alive in Egypt because of the lack of essential necessities and affordable lifestyle. Despite the corruption in elections and an overpowering ruling class, people will still continue to demand their rights!

    As for why they would invade Iran. Resources, resources, resources. And more specifically OIL. Check out how many rich Americans became even richer during the Bush era. You would be amazed!

    ReplyDelete
  11. @anonymous,I began to think more and more that Amre is Racoon because I rarely have seen an Iraqi who is blessing the days of Saddam
    about Iran , the resources and the location dear both of them

    ReplyDelete
  12. Salam Zaynab,


    I think I have sort of dropped out on what is going on here, as it appears I reminfd you of someone you dont like. Sorry for that.

    Concerning Saddam, the majority of Iraqis including myself used to secretly complain about his adventures and his quenching of all sorts of political dissent , even the peaceful one,. However the Majority of Iraqis now adays , having experienced the dual American and Iranian occupation, are crying their hearts out for the days of Sadam. Except for, iranian-iraqis and sectarian fantic shiites.

    Dear anon, you can't imagine how cruel and sensless it is to mention black water that is in collaboration with Iran are both, killing iraqis like rabbits and RAPING ARAB MUSLIM WOMEN.

    Allah Hafeez

    ReplyDelete
  13. @Siku, Amin !!

    @Racoon , sorry for the mistake , but you to have apologize us for this , abut Saddam , well I know several Iraqis who now say that yes Saddam was a bad ass dictator but at still we had our homes and lived our life safely ,in fact Saddam days there was a security in the country
    but do not you agree that he was the one who made thing to reach to this by his stupid adventures from wars ,i mean I understand the international plans for oil and resources , but he gave them a golden opportunity during the Kuwait invasion I am afraid

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes, I agree, but to a limited extent, however. He fell head on into a perfect trap set up by Americans and some Arabs in 1990. The Americans encouraged him to enter Kuwait, only to catch him off guard afterwards.

    As for Iran, well, Putting an end to the crook Khomeini and defeating Iran was a must to secure the tremendous progress Iraq was going through. We – the Iraqis know Iranians better than anyone else we have been their neighbours for thousands of years. Bad neighbours, though. Iranians are the sort of people, ‘Ishko ha betgoola bimesser, lzamlohm al-3in al 7amara’, meaning that if they were not shown shear power they would promptly go out of line. Sadam had no choice but to break Iran. Days have proven his long vision regarding Iran, now after the Invasion the Iranians entered Iraq and they are literally dismantling the country and wreaking death and havoc everywhere.

    In the mean time Saddam should have listened to the Americans after the war with Iran. In 1988 a congressional delegation met with him to inquire about his prospective policies regarding Israel, Saddam simply responded by reiterating that there is no such thing as Israel but, rather, it is called Palestine. That was the end of modern Iraq. As simple as that.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Racoon is Amre but let's face it Zeinobia, you had to edit him previously and told him to leave your forum so he had to change his name and behave.

    Hopefully he will continue to behave. Frankly my dear, I think he is somewhat infatuated with you. He keeps changing his name so he can keep coming back. Too funny!

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Racoon , strangely for years your neighbours were peaceful ,I mean during the time of Shah they were not that bad
    It is not about Israel ,more about his ego ,the Americans understood that this man who worships his ego and for that was the real end of any ruler and any era

    @anonymous ,I do not give a damn as long as the people here stick to my rules and keep it clean

    ReplyDelete
  17. You are absolutely right Zeinobia, Saddam's heel of Achilles was his inflated booming ego. Yet , as it appears to me, you are a bit confounding means with ends. Israelians were terrified of the growing Iraqi power. And Saddam showed no intentions to compromise. Thus his ego was the means used Israelians to push into the trap.

    Regarding Iran. Well in 1937 the Shah Pahlavi senior asked for territorial concession s in the south. Since then relations between Iraq and Iran was quite tensed. However, Iranian didn’t go to war because of the British presence.

    After the revolution of 1958, Iranians were scared of the growing pan-Arab feelings inspired by Nasser. Hence they kept quite. Still they kept sending messages to Al-Bakr interfering in Iraq’s internal affairs.

    In 1973, Shah escalated his support to the Kurds In order to open new front on the Iraqi army fighting in Syria. After the war, it became clear that Iraq is significant military power. Saddam signed a treaty with the Shah in 1974 to stop the Iranian support for the Kurdish terrorists. When Khomeini ascended to power and started off calling for invading Baghdad, that was it, Iran had to be beaten.

    And I assure these events are thousands of years old. It was the Iranian barbarian tribes that sacked and destroyed the ancient Iraq, and mimicked its genius brilliant civilisation. Do you know that the Persian liberated Israleians from the Babylonians enslavement .

    I will not even discuss the Amre issue. It is a bit uncomprenhsible on part of Mr anonymous to insist that I am someone else whom you happpen to dislike, despite of the fact that I have nothing but admiration for your blog and your professional talented writings.

    ReplyDelete

Thank You for your comment
Please keep it civilized here, racist and hateful comments are not accepted
The Comments in this blog with exclusion of the blog's owner does not represent the views of the blog's owner.